Damian Golding
My feedback
20 results found
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding supported this idea · -
12 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
98 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding commentedWe are keen to be able to see a list of forum subscribers as well. A basic count is not sufficient for us.
-
19 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
11 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
124 votes
Many thanks for your comments and feedback in this thread - it was super helpful for us in analysis and design of the feature.
I'm happy to announce that we're working on adding donations to compensate payment processing fees. This feature will be released later this year.Some design decisions I wanted to speak out explicitly:
1. We decided to proceed with optional donations to compensate credit card processing fees as opposed to surcharges/convenience fee.
Main reasons for this is that there are too many regulations around mandatory charges to compensate fees: it's illegal in some countries/states, there are caps on how much you could charge, etc. To avoid all of this legal complications we decided to suggest members to opt-in to compensate processing fees, as opposed to make them obligatory.
All these transactions will be recorded as donations in WA and can be later used for tax deduction.2. You…
An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding commentedThese transaction fees are a significant issue for Not for Profit organisations. Wild Apricot can make a significant difference by allowing them to be added to the invoiced amount.
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding commentedWe would like to archive past events as well. At least have the ability to reduce the amount displayed in the calendar widget.
Damian Golding supported this idea · -
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding commentedWe use bundles to represent corporate membership groups as well. It would be great if the membership information could be transferred automatically.
-
42 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding commentedOffering members irrelevant registration options introduces unwanted complexity to our event sign up process. We would like a "non-members only" registration type availability to be added.
Damian Golding supported this idea · -
9 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
106 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding commentedI needed to use this feature today! I don't really need it for member activity but just for those with admin access who are making changes that affect others.
-
73 votesEvgeny Zaritovskiy responded
Current proposal: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0f9kMyQqlBsV1UzVVYwS21ZU28/view?usp=sharing
We do not have plans yet on when we’re going to deliver on this.
Damian Golding supported this idea · -
82 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
215 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
74 votesEvgeny Zaritovskiy responded
Merged several posts together, so that both public and admins lists can be customized. This is better for analysis and design to work on them together.
An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding commentedWe would like to add Title and Company Name to the Registered Attendees List.
Maybe this could be controlled via the privacy settings?
Damian Golding supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment Damian Golding commentedWe would like to add "Title" and "Company Name" to the attendees lists.
Maybe the could be done via privacy settings?
-
51 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
21 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
-
20 votesDamian Golding supported this idea ·
When I spoke to Wild Apricot support I was advised that:
"This is by design for bundle groups. Some bundles can be with family members with no email addresses (seniors/kids, etc) and organizations may require these groups to fill out their respective form for that additional member, etc."
I find it hard to believe that this is the most common use case.
Surely we can be given the ability to configure this?