Webmaster
My feedback
92 results found
-
21 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
149 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
201 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
This is a known limitation of Wild Apricot. See printing instructions – https://help.wildapricot.com/display/DOC/Printing+in+Wild+Apricot
An error occurred while saving the comment Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Webmaster
commented
I have two different organizations for which I am their webmaster. BOTH would REALLY love this feature. How do I vote this up again to reflect that another organization would like this feature??
Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
-
486 votes
Team Husky
responded
Sorry for the late update.
The first step was finished and emails can now be carbon copied to contact’s alternative emails. To do so the contact fields which store the alternative emails must be explicitly marked on the email setting page.
Unsubscribing will unsubscribe all alternative emails simultaneously because they all belong to the very same account. The person clicking “unsubscribe” is warned about this on the unsubscribe page.
For now we paused the development of this feature. but not for good. :) So I’m changing this wish status back to “collecting comments”.
Thank you everyone for a valuable feedback.
An error occurred while saving the comment Webmaster
commented
This is becoming a seriously big issue for BOTH organizations I represent. Both use WA and both need - really NEED - this feature.
Here's the problem at the first organization:
Because we have family memberships, the primary email address goes to one spouse/partner. As a result, only one of them receives emails. So the other spouse/partner then signs up as a "contact" which does two things:
1) inflates our contact list, causing us to go over our 500 allocation every few months, until I am forced to archive out all the spouses which just gets them all angry and me and at WA for the lack of features, and
2) still prevents the spouse from getting all the emails anyway because quite a few only go to "members only" so then I get complaints that WA isn't working properly.
Here's the problem at the second organization: We have group memberships purchased by companies but the individual memberships need that second email because they lose their membership and event history when they change jobs and emails. This has created a record-keeping nightmare when trying to sort it all out. We are all volunteers - none of us get paid for all the hours of sorting that happens and we're having serious problems trying to recruit volunteers to help because NO ONE wants to do this kind of manual clean-up on a regular basis (which it has become).
Honestly, I'm tired of defending WA on this and at this point, I can't recommend that anyone move to WA if they need this feature - it's become that big a problem for us. This was something that you had on your development list for all of 2015, you moved it to a Q4 2016 release, now you've downgraded it. Why? This has a lot of votes, you have a lot of reasons and examples of why this is needed. Please, please, please, move this up the list!
An error occurred while saving the comment Webmaster
commented
Is this going anywhere? I ask because this was listed as an enhancement that was to have been in the Sept 2016 bundle/release but then it was pushed to the end of 2016 and now it looks like it's still in the "collecting comments" step.
This is something that we've needed for the last three years and the members are getting restless.
Since all the spouses and significant others have added themselves as "contacts" to get around this and we keep going over our allotted number of contacts.
Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
180 votesEvgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Merged together several closely related by meaning ideas – so we can properly resolve them all together, in different live scenarios
Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
311 votesEvgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Collecting comments now.
Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
369 votesEvgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
I merged another very similar thread into this one, they should be solved together – the registration to multiple events should be simple and fast if possible. There are a number of suggestions in comments on how to achieve this.
Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
55 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
Team Events
responded
WORKAROUND: it is possible to set different colors using custom javascript. See section “Color coding events using event tags” at
https://help.wildapricot.com/display/DOC/Event+tags#Eventtags-colorcodingColorcodingeventsusingeventtagsAn error occurred while saving the comment Webmaster
commented
We would LOVE this feature!
This would make the calendar easier to read by making it easy to see which committee is doing what and when at a glance.
It would make several of the other suggestions that I've seen here null and void because this would address a lot of the problems.
Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
152 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
180 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
248 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
229 votesWebmaster
supported this idea
·
-
244 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Webmaster
commented
Whoops! Posted too soon.... Here are our top two use cases:
1) We want select users (via Group) to access pages with reports posted and as of now, we have no reliable way to see if they are even hitting the page we designed for them.
2) Last Login is not a reportable field so we do not have the ability to pull a list of members/users who have not logged in within the x number of days/months (insert time frame here).
An error occurred while saving the comment Webmaster
commented
Absolutely everything in the original post!
Webmaster
supported this idea
·
Yeah, so the article posted by Evgeny is now totally obsolete now that the print icon has been arbitrarily removed. Our organization has been totally hamstrung by this.
Our Membership Committee (of 8) now ALL need admin access just to view potential members AND we need someone else to RE-TYPE the entire membership application because you cannot even pull a report of the application data. Why do we need this, you may ask? Because we are required to perform a background check on EVERY member and we used to be able to print a PDF of the membership application to send to a security company to run these checks. Now, we cannot do that and sending tons of screen prints is not an option. (Fun fact: did you know that you can't run a report of potential members? They have to be approved as members first, and only THEN can you run a report but then you have people who should not necessarily be members, running amok in your system because you activated them before their background checks came through.)
This is the most short-sighted software change I think I've ever seen. At least give us the ability to run a report that pulls ALL fields from the membership application while the potential candidate is still just that, a potential candidate.