Type in your suggestion - new feature or improvement idea

Voting/Elections

Current features:
No supported, an external tool must be used (e.g. wufoo.com)

Desired features:
Ability for existing members to vote for existing contacts/members (e.g. board members elections) .

345 votes
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    michtkh shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    83 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Tracy commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        In our annual board member elections, each member votes for 6 people from the slate of candidates. Each voting member will need to be restricted to voting once, but have the ability to vote for a specified multiple or maximum number of candidates depending on the set up preference.

      • Deane Southworth commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        When alpha testing is available, I would like to be included. This should be a priority since most organizations have elections!

      • Annette Cook commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I'd like WA to offer a feature that allows us to have elections with ballots that are only available to our members. They would have to log in but their responses would be encrypted in such a way as not to be able to know who the voted for, nor allow for a member to vote more than once. Thank you.

      • AdminTeam CMS (Website CMS and Themes, Wild Apricot) commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Right now planned release date is 25 September. If all goes well. If we will stumble on some unexpected problems, then the date will be moved to 12 Oct. Though for now everything looks good.

        Feature will be available at first only to clients that answered our alpha testing form that we emailed to everyone who voted for this topic.

        Within 2-3 weeks after that we have plans to make it available for everyone.

        After that we are planning to update this feature with new functionality every month. (We hope to be able to update it each 2 weeks, but we can not promise that we will be able too until we try. So that is a secret.)

        Fingers crossed

      • AdminTeam CMS (Website CMS and Themes, Wild Apricot) commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Alex,

        With first release only one person per vote anonymous will be available. As it is the most requested type of voting. But we will definitely make identified voting and membership based restriction. Right after we release election poll type and ability to share polls at the website with the gadget.

      • Jon Crossno commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        To add an additional "wrinkle", let me explain the situation the association I represent deals with. We are a regional chapter of a larger national library association, and while we are a completely separate entity from the national group, we function as an affiliated organization.

        In our annual elections, we have 2-3 positions that all of *our* members must vote for, but we also have 1-3 positions for which only members of both our association and the national association are eligible to vote.

        So ideally, what we would need in the voting/elections aspect is the ability to restrict certain "questions" (using conditional logic) to be viewed only by a specific member group or using criteria from the membership database. This would allow us to run a single ballot, with the positions eligible for members of both associations only showing up for those members.

        Alternatively, we could follow the same model we have for our current online voting method: create 2 separate surveys/ballots, with one going to members of both association, and the other only to our members.

      • AlexSirota commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Will you allow one person per vote anonymous voting? Or just identified, membership based voting?

      • janetspin commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Our organization holds annual board elections where the bundle administrator is the authorized voter of group memberships. It would be great if the voting/election process has a way to select the bundle administrator to receive the election emails.

        We also have a range of board vacancy's each year. It would be great if there is an election ballot option to preset the # of candidates that can be selected by voter.

        Sometimes we want to send out repeat emails, such as election ballots to a group of individuals. Is it possible to custom a member/contact search only by the name, email address, or other custom field; so that this type of search can be saved for election emails (or other emails)?

      • Zeenat Iqbal commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Our organization holds annual board elections, open only to certain membership categories (as many professional organizations do). Currently elections are conducted manually, i.e., pull member list from WA and set up voting profiles at https://heliosvoting.org/. It would make our elections infinitely smoother if WA integrated this type of functionality into the system.

      • Jason commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Every nonprofit I have been a part of has a voting election. This would be good in WA because we only allow paid members to vote. It doesn't have to be very complex, but would be a great addition and time saver.

      • Philip Waidner commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        A gadget for board members to vote on issues. An organization could put this gadget on a board member only page, anybody with access could propose a new idea, it would need someone else to second it and everybody can vote. Settings can change some of the common rules, but I'm imaging that you could set the minimum number or percentage of the group for a quorum and the issue would be automatically decided if that number of group members replies.

      • Richard Siegel commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        RICH
        THIS FUNCTIONALITY HAS MANY BENEFITS AND ALL IMPORTANT TO
        WILD APRICOT USERS. IF INTEGRATED, SECURITY IS UPMOST IMPORTANT
        TO PREVENT MULTIPLE VOTING AND VIEWER ACCESS. PERHAPS IT COULD BE LINKED TO THE SECURED MEMBERSHIP LIST?

      • Denise Ross commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Since you have polls pop up on the admin side of the web for us to give feedback, could you add that same functionality for us to use?

      • TangentRW commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This is just another thought that came to me:

        Have elections a specifically assignable administrator role, e.g. for an organization secretary.

      ← Previous 1 3 4 5

      Feedback and Knowledge Base