Cindy Cooper
My feedback
-
11 votesCindy Cooper
shared this idea
·
-
85 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
277 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesCindy Cooper
commented
I really WANT cancellations included, or an option to have them included. I would like to have cancellation date as an option for a field to select to be included in the export file. We have many cancellations to events and would like to know more about who and when.
-
2 votesCindy Cooper
commented
Oops I have to edit to say there is a manual way, we need the automated, prescheduled way.
Cindy Cooper
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesCindy Cooper
commented
I think this description means a list of people waiting for an event yet to be scheduled. It doesn't mean a waitlist in the Wild Apricot terms. We do this by created an event called "Interest in Book Club" for example. People can register for this and the next time we have enough, we start a new club. This way people can see themselves on the list and self cancel if they are no longer interested.
-
1 voteCindy Cooper
commented
Also, the individual who is shown as anonymous because of this problem cannot change it themselves either (we tested it).
Cindy Cooper
shared this idea
·
-
15 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesCindy Cooper
commented
The capability to do this is available through use of a password, but that is awkward. We would rather have a simple way to create a limitation on who can sign up. Further, we would like to put a numerical limit on some groups, while allowing different limits or unlimited registration by other groups.
Cindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
We implemented the cancellation on both platforms (1.2 version for Android and 2.0 version for iOS).
Cindy Cooper
commented
Members can self cancel on the website but not on the mobile app. This function is too important not to be available on both interfaces.
Cindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
Cindy Cooper
commented
If members could manage their own guests, this ability would not be needed. But for now, since admins must perform this function, we should have the ability to do it on the mobile app like we do on the website.
-
149 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesCindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesCindy Cooper
shared this idea
·
-
11 votesCindy Cooper
shared this idea
·
-
253 votes
Even though it is not a direct implementation, I hope this could be helpful:
We just launched integration with Integromat platform, which helps to build automated workflows. We also provide several templates for quick start, and one of them allows to copy google calendar events into WA events. So if you share a google calendar for events submission, then the scenario could copy submitted events into your Wild Apricot account.
You can try this integration by this link https://www.integromat.com/en/integration/2275-copy-google-calendar-into-wild-apricot-eventsCindy Cooper
commented
Most of this looks terrific! I take it all of these would be free events as I see no place to put price. Also no limit or waitlist capability, unless the administrator can add it later?
No approval from administrators - you make a big assumption that we would trust all members. Usually it's just a few who might go outside the norms, and it's impossible to create groups of "approved" for events without offending those who are not approved for events. At least the option to have an administrator emailed when the event is created allows quick response to take down something that would not be approved.
More likely, additional questions might need to be asked for the event to have full information before it is sent out to members, such as carpooling, etc. We have an approval process for new members, seems there should be one for new events.
Cindy Cooper
supported this idea
·
This needs to include past members who are currently archived. When I try to retrieve info, it only looks at current members.