Frank
My feedback
205 results found
-
20 votes
Team Mobile
responded
Could you please elaborate whether you are looking for login into slack with wild apricot credentials, or login into WA with slack (as it is already implemented for google+ and facebook)?
An error occurred while saving the comment
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment
Frank
commented
Very nice!
-
18 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Frank
responded
Really interesting idea, looking forward to seeing more interest (votes) and comments from everyone. Thanks Jessica!
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
86 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
65 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Merged multiple thread into this one. Please, vote (click Vote button) to increase its priority
An error occurred while saving the comment
Frank
commented
Interesting idea. What benefits are available for one day that you wouldn't want to access the other 29 days?
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
213 votes
Hello everyone,
I've been working on this idea for a while, and most of you have described the same trap. You need a volunteer to run one or several events, and the only way to let them is to hand over your whole contact database and your finances. But there are different events and different needs. So I'd like to test the shape with you before we build it.
The idea is to maintain the current role of Event Manager, which currently grants access to all events. However, you can also limit this access and assign the person to specific events by choosing from one of three levels of access:
- Check-in assistant - welcome people at the door, handle walk-ins. Sees their assigned events and who's registered. Checks people in, signs up whoever turns up, takes payment at the door. Cannot edit the event or its registrations.
- Registration manager -…
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Frank
shared this idea
·
-
116 votes
Concurrent membership is not something easy to implement - it would require fundamental redesign of how membership works in WA. However, I have couple of thoughts here that I wanted to hear your feedback on.
As I understand, there are 2 sides of the problem:
1. Collecting additional dues for services. E.g. Member is associate and board member, so you need to collect both dues.
- This can be addressed using our extra fields functionality. Maybe it's a bit clunky, but it should work. E.g. setup associate member as primary membership and add extra charge checkbox for being a board member.
- You can easily filter down any members you need with advances search by that extra field.
2. Setting correct permissions on website pages - here there's no workaround we could suggest, but adding permissions based on saved searches seems to feasable option.
Am I missing something? Will the…
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
80 votes
Frank
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Frank
commented
Is this any type of attachment or do you need to attach a specific type (e.g. invoice) ?
Great suggestion! Looking forward to seeing a lot of votes and comments from other users!