Mary Adams
My feedback
13 results found
-
61 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
66 votesMary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesMary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
commented
I like the idea but see the challenges explained below. At a minimum, a note that tells people that changes will not be saved to their profile would be nice. A password prompt would be even better.
Mary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
73 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Current proposal: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0f9kMyQqlBsV1UzVVYwS21ZU28/view?usp=sharing
We do not have plans yet on when we’re going to deliver on this.
An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
commented
The Feb 12 2016 proposal would work really well for us. We use sponsor/member logos in multiple places and gadgets around our site. They look terrible in 110x110. Would love to see this asap!
Mary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
92 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
commented
Want to add to my previous comment about sponsor profiles. We are currently using the featured member gadget to create displays of different sponsors. It's great because we can include the sponsors on lots of pages but manage changes from the database. The gadget works pretty well except that the dimensions of the profile display are optimized for head shots. It would be great to have a different display that is horizontal to accommodate logos which tend to be horizontal these days.
An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
commented
We are also a business association. We have a single member level called Sponsors that is free. There are too many variations and kinds of pricing to create separate levels for each. This means, however, that we have to do the invoicing outside WA. (We use the featured member gadget to include sponsor logos on key pages. There's no way to sort profiles so we have to use a gadget for each level of sponsor but it's nice to have the sponsors displayed in a way that's responsive.)
Mary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Concurrent membership is not something easy to implement - it would require fundamental redesign of how membership works in WA. However, I have couple of thoughts here that I wanted to hear your feedback on.
As I understand, there are 2 sides of the problem:
1. Collecting additional dues for services. E.g. Member is associate and board member, so you need to collect both dues.
- This can be addressed using our extra fields functionality. Maybe it's a bit clunky, but it should work. E.g. setup associate member as primary membership and add extra charge checkbox for being a board member.
- You can easily filter down any members you need with advances search by that extra field.
2. Setting correct permissions on website pages - here there's no workaround we could suggest, but adding permissions based on saved searches seems to feasable option.
Am I missing something? Will the…
An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
commented
Our memberships are linked to geography. So some members want to pay for two different geographies. For that, we need the ability for a member to have the option of more than one membership level.
(Our profiles are very important so different log-ins for different membership levels does not work)
Mary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
255 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
commented
We would like to allow certain key members (such as committee chairs) to have read-only admin access. But the current definition of read-only includes the ability to download the full contact list of the organization.
Our organization has over 4,000 names on our contact list. Even though we trust the people to whom we would give access, it feels inappropriate to give this capability to anyone but full admins. Frankly, I'm not even really sure why this is the case today?
Mary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
106 votesMary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesEvgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
For now, this is not something we’re going to change – not sure if ever.
Workaround to use: create a special “entry” free level to apply to, and close “normal” ones for application. For the entry level, create also a dropdown field where a potential member can choose a level they want to apply to. Add other fields you need to assess the application. When application is successful, your admin is to change membership level to required one and generate membership invoice (membership upgrade invoice). The member will be emailed with the invoice and can pay.An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
commented
We are new to Wild Apricot. I have to say that when we saw the check boxes for requiring approval prior to accepting a membership, we expected the payment to not be invoiced until we accepted the membership. So we were surprised when the opposite happened.
Our membership committees take their jobs seriously and spend time evaluating an applicant. We have not taken payment in the past until the application was approved.
We definitely vote for this improvement.
Mary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMary Adams
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Mary Adams
commented
We see a lot of value in this. We use the directory to drive people to a member's profile but there's no indication on the profile of the content the member has contributed to the community.
-
111 votesEvgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Merged multiple thread into this one. Please, vote (click Vote button) to increase its priority
Mary Adams
supported this idea
·
-
69 votesMary Adams
supported this idea
·
We'd like to be able to let a varying number of members form groups using the bundles. The only way to do this practically is to have a per-person fee for being in the bundle. All the other functionality would work for us.