Elizabeth Bass Webmaster
My feedback
61 results found
-
5 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
89 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
I’m making this not just about events, but other lists too – this is a common usability problem.
Elizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
50 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
33 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
44 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
213 votes
Hello everyone,
I've been working on this idea for a while, and most of you have described the same trap. You need a volunteer to run one or several events, and the only way to let them is to hand over your whole contact database and your finances. But there are different events and different needs. So I'd like to test the shape with you before we build it.
The idea is to maintain the current role of Event Manager, which currently grants access to all events. However, you can also limit this access and assign the person to specific events by choosing from one of three levels of access:
- Check-in assistant - welcome people at the door, handle walk-ins. Sees their assigned events and who's registered. Checks people in, signs up whoever turns up, takes payment at the door. Cannot edit the event or its registrations.
- Registration manager -…
Elizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
124 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
107 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
65 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
261 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth Bass Webmaster
commented
I would like a simple addition to this: whenever a change is made to a contact, invoice, payment, refund, etc., the person making the change should be required to add a comment (which would be used to explain the reason for the change). Currently when I look in the audit log, I just see something like "Refund deleted by Treasurer. Amount $20." or "Payment edited by Treasurer. Amount $20." It doesn't explain what the reason was, or what exactly the change was that happened.
Elizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
-
54 votesElizabeth Bass Webmaster
supported this idea
·
I would also like to request this feature. We have the same reason: Student members have a discounted rate, but only while attending school, and they must submit verification of attendance at an approved school. Currently they are able to renew and become active without providing any verification of student status.
Currently I simply set up a filter in my email to flag those renewals when they come in, but Wild Apricot is still allowing them to become active, causing more manual workload for me.
Thanks!