PAmela Graham
My feedback
40 results found
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment PAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
180 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Merged together several closely related by meaning ideas – so we can properly resolve them all together, in different live scenarios
PAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
221 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment PAmela Graham
commented
Yes please!! This would make me very happy. We have lots of information pages 'not in menu' and not being able to sort and order them is a nightmare. Ideally drag and drop like the menu pages.
-
256 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment PAmela Graham
commented
Yes please, really useful to direct groups to a specific landing page at certain times of the year!
PAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
103 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
105 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
127 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment PAmela Graham
commented
We have a junior section which operates independently. The Officials in charge of this section don't need to see all the records of the whole membership, just the families involved in their section. They do need access to contact details, and to at tleast be aware if they have or have not paid their dues in order to register for specialised training events. It would be perfect if we offer them access to that subsection of members records only, along with the ability to email that group only. Please consider this, because as others have said, there are data protection issues both in just exporting member data to volunteer officials and in allowing the alternative of completely separate database systems to be developed because the information on WA is not readily available to them.
PAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment PAmela Graham
commented
Me too for this type of search option and the below mentioned Boolean logic. I do wish the advanced search was a bit less limited. I have 47 different membership levels (I know – its crazy!) to allow for 2 application levels and then all sorts of combinations of family groups/discounted senior rates/junior rates/members with & without boats at our sailing club/ and separate admin & system testers. If I need to exclude any of the membership levels from a search I have to do each one individually. It would be SO great to be able to check the box to include/exclude a number of levels in one go, without having to add a new criteria and check the box for each one. Is there any chance this sort of thing in is the search facility development pipeline?
PAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesPAmela Graham
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
Thanks for opportunity to vote on this for Uk