Erin L.
My feedback
17 results found
-
4 votes
Erin L. shared this idea ·
-
2 votes
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
261 votes
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
269 votes
Dmitry Smirnov
responded
Even though it is not a direct implementation, I hope this could be helpful:
We just launched integration with Integromat platform, which helps to build automated workflows. We also provide several templates for quick start, and one of them allows to copy google calendar events into WA events. So if you share a google calendar for events submission, then the scenario could copy submitted events into your Wild Apricot account.
You can try this integration by this link https://www.integromat.com/en/integration/2275-copy-google-calendar-into-wild-apricot-eventsAn error occurred while saving the comment Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
213 votes
Hello everyone,
I've been working on this idea for a while, and most of you have described the same trap. You need a volunteer to run one or several events, and the only way to let them is to hand over your whole contact database and your finances. But there are different events and different needs. So I'd like to test the shape with you before we build it.
The idea is to maintain the current role of Event Manager, which currently grants access to all events. However, you can also limit this access and assign the person to specific events by choosing from one of three levels of access:
- Check-in assistant - welcome people at the door, handle walk-ins. Sees their assigned events and who's registered. Checks people in, signs up whoever turns up, takes payment at the door. Cannot edit the event or its registrations.
- Registration manager -…
An error occurred while saving the comment Erin L. commented
Our organization also has each event run by a different Chairperson. I can only give them view-only access, but that means if there is are mistakes in a registration, I have to fix every one myself and cannot delegate to the appropriate chair. Being able to control what kind of access a person gets for a specific event is extremely important!
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
159 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
No progress
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
180 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Merged together several closely related by meaning ideas – so we can properly resolve them all together, in different live scenarios
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
103 votes
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
144 votes
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Erin L. shared this idea ·
-
99 votes
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
109 votes
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
53 votes
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Erin L. commented
It would be nice to be able to enforce limits on a single member's registrations for an event. i.e. each member could only register five people for a specific event.
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Erin L. shared this idea ·
-
138 votes
Erin L. supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Erin L. shared this idea ·
A subdivision of Event Manager would work for us. As a non-profit, we have volunteers chair all our individual events. Right now, with the all-or-nothing Event Manager title, they could accidentally mess with each other's events. The google calendar isn't really a fix for us since not all of our members have google accounts.