Jon Carlson
My feedback
10 results found
-
3 votesJon Carlson
shared this idea
·
-
101 votesJon Carlson
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesJon Carlson
supported this idea
·
-
146 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Old design proposal, not working on it yet and can be changed if we start working on it – https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0f9kMyQqlBsZ3FQOWRiMERRNkk/view?usp=sharing
An error occurred while saving the comment Jon Carlson
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Concurrent membership is not something easy to implement - it would require fundamental redesign of how membership works in WA. However, I have couple of thoughts here that I wanted to hear your feedback on.
As I understand, there are 2 sides of the problem:
1. Collecting additional dues for services. E.g. Member is associate and board member, so you need to collect both dues.
- This can be addressed using our extra fields functionality. Maybe it's a bit clunky, but it should work. E.g. setup associate member as primary membership and add extra charge checkbox for being a board member.
- You can easily filter down any members you need with advances search by that extra field.
2. Setting correct permissions on website pages - here there's no workaround we could suggest, but adding permissions based on saved searches seems to feasable option.
Am I missing something? Will the…
An error occurred while saving the comment Jon Carlson
commented
With the new online store, one can set up a purchase of a one time item. However, we need to be able to bill members for optional recurring services (e.g. monthly). They'd need to be able to subscribe/unsubscribe, obviously, and update their credit card etc. But a recurring item separate from membership would be useful.
Thanks.
Jon Carlson
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJon Carlson
shared this idea
·
-
24 votesJon Carlson
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesJon Carlson
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesJon Carlson
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesJon Carlson
shared this idea
·
Contact and member searches (particularly saved searches) need to be able to apply the "ANY"/"ALL" (i.e. "OR"/"AND") logic in a mixed way. For example, I might need to search for (Member Level of X OR Y) AND (Member Status is ACTIVE). That's just one simple example. Give me a way to group them and then connect the groups.
Possible way to present the concept - chain the searches. So build one search with ANY logic, then build another search with ANY logic, then chain the two with AND logic. Something along those lines.