Anton Ferreira

My feedback

  1. 188 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    64 comments  ·  Wishlist » Members  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anton Ferreira supported this idea  · 
    Anton Ferreira shared this idea  · 
  2. 169 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    78 comments  ·  Wishlist » Emails  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Merged together several closely related by meaning ideas – so we can properly resolve them all together, in different live scenarios

    Anton Ferreira supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anton Ferreira commented  · 

    We would find it useful to specify the senders email address

    Most of the information we send out and events organised is done by different people / group leaders and it would be clearer if the emails came from them.

    A drop down of all admins would work for us, perhaps it defaults to the email they are logged in as.

  3. 57 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  Wishlist » Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anton Ferreira supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anton Ferreira commented  · 

    I would also like the ability to colour categorise calendar events, right now we use multiple calendars, but all one 1 calendar, with different colours for each category would be great.

    Green for Cub events, Yellow for Scouts, Red for Leaders, Blue for Commitee, etc.

  4. 96 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    47 comments  ·  Wishlist » Members  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    For me personally, this a great suggestion and I’ve been thinking about it for long time myself. Ideally, I’d really like completely redesign our membership levels to concurrent subscriptions model. Subscription gives you access to some information or provide privileges. There can be multiple ways of buying it – e.g. for a year or two, recurring or not, etc. Altogether, subscription-based model is very robust and easy to understand. Please, vote!

    Anton Ferreira supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anton Ferreira commented  · 

    This would solve our dilema. We are trying to run a cub / scout group and most information and events are for either cubs or scouts not both. Most members are actually the parents of cubs and scouts, so we want to keep them informed and not anoyed, that means sending relevant information and event invites to either cubs or scouts, seldom both.

    Problem is, parents sometimes do have a child in cubs and scouts, so we could not use Cub or Scout membership, we have used Parent. We have used Groups to seperate cubs and scouts, so membership = parent, group = either cub or scout or cub and scout, but we are finding neither Membership type nor Group membership useful to limit event announcements and the process of doing advanced search to constrain on Group membership when doing email blasts is too complex for our Group Leaders. The email blast history soes also not show who the blast was send to, ie Cubs or scouts.

    Perhaps allowing multiple membership would help our situation, but giving Groups greater power in WA would have a greater benefit as it offers multiple concurrent grouping options in addition to the single Membership type.

Feedback and Knowledge Base