publicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
My feedback
9 results found
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment publicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment publicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
commented
As a sporting organisation we very much need something like this to cater for age bracket competitions.
The suggestion below (Evgeny Zaritovskiy) that "the only choice is to place you and other members into special membership level" is simply unacceptable, as it would mean:
1. Disrupting established organisational processes AND confusing the hell out of existing members.
2. Requiring (in our circumstance) no less than 11 different membership types - and without some sort of age verification field the potential for every member to make 10 different types of mistake! - see point #1.
This suggestion has been around for more than a decade in more than one thread - are you going to do something about it or not? A simple yes or no answer would be greatly appreciated.publicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
-
9 votespublicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
-
3 votespublicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
-
4 votespublicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
-
12 votespublicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
-
24 votespublicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
-
37 votespublicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Updated title to reflect that it’s not just about levels copying – which is about adding new levels, but also about copying of (some) settings from one level to some or all others
publicofficer@fencingsa.org.au
supported this idea
·
@Evgeny Zaritovskiy
It seems like the common consensus is to have this list sorted alphabetically. Seems strange that this wasn't done from the start considering it is the global #1 method for finding names in a list...
Can you just get it done please? People have been asking for it for 10 years now.