Anonymous
My feedback
6 results found
-
21 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
44 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Concurrent membership is not something easy to implement - it would require fundamental redesign of how membership works in WA. However, I have couple of thoughts here that I wanted to hear your feedback on.
As I understand, there are 2 sides of the problem:
1. Collecting additional dues for services. E.g. Member is associate and board member, so you need to collect both dues.
- This can be addressed using our extra fields functionality. Maybe it's a bit clunky, but it should work. E.g. setup associate member as primary membership and add extra charge checkbox for being a board member.
- You can easily filter down any members you need with advances search by that extra field.
2. Setting correct permissions on website pages - here there's no workaround we could suggest, but adding permissions based on saved searches seems to feasable option.
Am I missing something? Will the…
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
36 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
53 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
86 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
Our not-for-profit needs simultaneous membership levels for our sponsorship program and the ability to have access to membership level specific pages. Currently without this feature, we are looking into other options and canceling Wild Apricot.