Rick MacPherson
My feedback
2 results found
-
114 votes
Concurrent membership is not something easy to implement - it would require fundamental redesign of how membership works in WA. However, I have couple of thoughts here that I wanted to hear your feedback on.
As I understand, there are 2 sides of the problem:
1. Collecting additional dues for services. E.g. Member is associate and board member, so you need to collect both dues.
- This can be addressed using our extra fields functionality. Maybe it's a bit clunky, but it should work. E.g. setup associate member as primary membership and add extra charge checkbox for being a board member.
- You can easily filter down any members you need with advances search by that extra field.
2. Setting correct permissions on website pages - here there's no workaround we could suggest, but adding permissions based on saved searches seems to feasable option.
Am I missing something? Will the…
Rick MacPherson
supported this idea
·
-
208 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
We are a veterans organization and the inability to have more than one person utilize a common email presents a serious limitation for us. We have several couples that have both served in the military and that share an email address. Each is proud of their service and to exclude one of them from communications and tell their spouse to "please pass this information on to your husband/wife" will be considered a slight. Given that we have membership numbers for each person, I see no reason why email has to be another unique identifier. I see we're not the only organization to have this issue. Please consider changing it.