Skip to content

Mark Bower

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 213 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    87 comments  ·  Wishlist » Events  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you to everyone who shared feedback on this idea. It shaped the design, and gave us the detail that made it workable.

    The feature is in development. Here is what it will include:

    • A new Event organizer role, separate from Event manager, so someone can run specific events without access to the rest of the account and other events.
    • Three access levels, chosen per event: Check-in assistant, Registration manager and Event lead. Each level has own restrictions and designed accordingly.
    • Organizer(s) are assigned on the Event details by Full administrators and Event managers.
    • Organizers can’t see Contacts, Financial information, Emails and other pages. Only assigned events.
    • A separate release of the mobile Admin app will follow shortly after the web release, to support the new role.


    We’re aiming for a release in late November or December 2026. Dates may still move as we finish testing. We’ll post here…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Bower commented  · 

    Katya,
    This would work very well for us. I like the granularity of the rights being granted, and the hierarchy. We do NOT have individuals that need differing levels of access across different events. Typically, we have individuals that are responsible for a specific type of event and only that type of event. We run about a 100 unique events per year with about ten different types of events. The ability for Event Managers to retrieve and export the event registrations will save us quite a bit of time. Thanks for the update and look forward to seeing this functionality in a future release.
    Mark

    Mark Bower supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Wishlist » API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Bower supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Wishlist » Events  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Bower supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Developers » API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Bower supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Bower commented  · 

    Checking on this in 2026. I'm not able to get the cancelled registrations. I'm using the below GET command, but I am NOT getting the cancelled registrations. Tech support indicates that I should be getting them. Is anybody getting cancelled registrations? If so, can you please share the command that you're using.
    Thanks, Mark Bower

    url_get_registrations = "https://api.wildapricot.org/v2.2/accounts/" + account_id + "/eventregistrations?eventID=" + \
    event_id_num + "&includeWaitList=false"

  5. 37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Wishlist » Events  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Mark Bower supported this idea  ·