Casey
My feedback
1 result found
-
115 votes
Concurrent membership is not something easy to implement - it would require fundamental redesign of how membership works in WA. However, I have couple of thoughts here that I wanted to hear your feedback on.
As I understand, there are 2 sides of the problem:
1. Collecting additional dues for services. E.g. Member is associate and board member, so you need to collect both dues.
- This can be addressed using our extra fields functionality. Maybe it's a bit clunky, but it should work. E.g. setup associate member as primary membership and add extra charge checkbox for being a board member.
- You can easily filter down any members you need with advances search by that extra field.
2. Setting correct permissions on website pages - here there's no workaround we could suggest, but adding permissions based on saved searches seems to feasable option.
Am I missing something? Will the…
An error occurred while saving the comment Casey
supported this idea
·
Is 5 years and over 100 business customers not enough interest to get this prioritized? It's interesting because we all seem to have a financial interest in setting up a second membership . . . i.e. because you don't allow for this option, we're not as able to collect money for our organizations. This DOES NOT seem like the type of item you'd want to de-prioritize. Any updates on this front would be much appreciated.