John Dandurand
My feedback
2 results found
-
11 votesJohn Dandurand
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
146 votes
Evgeny Zaritovskiy
responded
Old design proposal, not working on it yet and can be changed if we start working on it – https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0f9kMyQqlBsZ3FQOWRiMERRNkk/view?usp=sharing
John Dandurand
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment John Dandurand
commented
This is a normal function for every single database I have used until WA. It does not seem to me that this should be an 'optional' feature. Lack of this functionality severely cripples searches. Additionally users need to be able to:
* have access to all of the fields when searching, not just a subset for each module
* choose which fields they want to export from a list of all fields in the databaseAn error occurred while saving the comment John Dandurand
commented
WA's search features are woefully limited. Users need to be able to:
* conduct multiple contiguous searches (e.g., a and b but not c OR d and e but not f, etc.)
* have access to all of the fields when searching, not just a subset for each module
* choose which fields they want to export from a list of all fields in the database
This is a common search scenario. WA needs Boolean logic capabilities for its searches. It is an SQL database, so such functionality should be available to the developers.