John Dandurand

My feedback

  1. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Wishlist » Contacts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Dandurand supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Dandurand commented  · 

    This is a common search scenario. WA needs Boolean logic capabilities for its searches. It is an SQL database, so such functionality should be available to the developers.

  2. 124 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    63 comments  ·  Wishlist » Contacts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Dandurand supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Dandurand commented  · 

    This is a normal function for every single database I have used until WA. It does not seem to me that this should be an 'optional' feature. Lack of this functionality severely cripples searches. Additionally users need to be able to:
    * have access to all of the fields when searching, not just a subset for each module
    * choose which fields they want to export from a list of all fields in the database

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Dandurand commented  · 

    WA's search features are woefully limited. Users need to be able to:
    * conduct multiple contiguous searches (e.g., a and b but not c OR d and e but not f, etc.)
    * have access to all of the fields when searching, not just a subset for each module
    * choose which fields they want to export from a list of all fields in the database

Feedback and Knowledge Base